BioMedTalk.COM  Forum - Life science, Medical science and Technology online board for the Scientific-Research Community of scientists, physicians, publishers, journalists, employers, job-seekers and the general public from all over the World to exchange ideas, post commentary, disseminate results and information of Life Sciences, Medical Sciences, Biotechnology, Health research, online debate and establishing new contacts.    
Bio & Med Science
Check Articles Rank (Hirsch index, Hirsch factor alternative) by author's name for the Life Science and Health, Biology and Medical research articles.
     
Just change the 'FamilyName Initials ...' to the author's name, e.g. Smith JH and click the “Go” button to retrieve the Articles Rank (Hirsch index, Hirsch factor alternative).
    
You are welcome to compare your Articles Rank (Hirsch index, Hirsch factor alternative) to the Articles Rank of your Colleagues or Boss.


Click the 'Go' button to retrieve Articles Rank (Hirsch index, Hirsch factor alternative).
Welcome to the BioMedTalk.com science Forum! Please, register for FREE, become a Member to our research Community and get a fully FREE Forums features including ranking articles by article index (Hirsch index, Hirsch factor alternative). BioMedTalk.com is the science website created to link researchers, scholars, physicians, science publishers and journalists working under research-related initiatives and technological development Programs as well as other Scientific, Education, Training programs and scientific-research Projects all over the World for the discovery in such disciplines as:
     Life, Biological, Medical, Health and Biomedical science as well as Biotechnology;
     Health and Food industry and technology (including genetically modified food - gm foods, genetically modified organisms, genetically modified animals);
     Pharmacology and toxicology (including pharmacokinetics, clinical pharmacology, pharmaceutical technology, environmental toxicology etc.);
     Environmental science and Management (including indoor environment, effects of global warming and bioterrorism, etc.);
     Energetic science (including alternative, renewable energy sources, fuel biotechnology, biodiesel, biogas, bioethanol etc.);
     Materials science and research (including biological activity of nanomaterials, nanotubes, nanoparticles, nanopowder, nanocomposites etc.);
     Society and science (including medical ethics, science ethics, Biometric, Genetic and Medical data usage etc.)
as well as applied scientists, stakeholders, manufacturers and the general public together for online scientific communication, discussion, debate and dissemination information of scientific research and its results.
BioMedTalk.com is a FREE service. You are welcome to search forum before posting a new topic. Also, take the time to read the Guidelines and Rules and find the article impact by Article Rank (Hirsch index, Hirsch factor alternative). Feel free to direct your advertising posts into an Advertising Category for establishing new contacts.*

To calculate Articles Rank (Hirsch index, Hirsch factor alternative) of scientific articles published by certain Author, change the "FamilyName Initials ..." to the author's name, e.g. Smith JH and click the "Go" button.    We are inviting you to publish your partnership profile at BioMedTalk.com to initiate partners search and to launch new Cooperation projects.    FP7 project 230550 - Ethical - Promoting International Debate on Ethical Implications of Data collection, use and retention for Biometric and Medical Applications.    This Category is for promotion and facilitation of the technology transfer for the benefit of the innovators and the public. We are inviting you to publish information about inventions and patents at BioMedTalk.com to make it easier for business companies to find and to license.    This Category is for conferences promotion. We are inviting you to publish information about conferences at BioMedTalk.com.


Register at
BioMedTalk.com

Register
for FREE and gain access to fully FREE Forums features.
Please, take the time to read the Guidelines and Rules.

Contact Us
Contact Us and let us know how you like our service, Web site and feel free to give us suggestions on how we can better serve your needs.

Bookmark
BioMedTalk.com
Please, bookmark us by holding down the (Ctrl) button, and pressing once the letter D.

Search
BioMedTalk.com
You are welcome to search forums before posting a new topic.

Quicklink to an Advertising Category
Advertising
in this Category is FREE for BioMedTalk.com Members.

Quicklink to the After Hours Category
Life is not only about work. So, see our
After Hours Category.

BioMedTalk banners for Exchange

     




















FP7 Project
NEPHH - Nanomaterials related environmental pollution and health hazards throughout their life cycle.

External Links


Partner's Links
Incontinence Products

Adult Diapers

Compare Brands of Adult Diapers At:
AdultDiaper.org
  #1  
Old Nov 6, 08, 07:44
nickcole nickcole is offline
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 145
Default Is this True? Is Coffee Safe During Pregnancy?

I found this article, and got curious!

Coffee is one of the most studied products in the world. Caffeine’s effect on pregnancy has been extensively researched. However, the results of research are controversial. It is supposed, that coffee can contribute to miscarriage, low birth weight, premature birth and stillbirth.

The question of coffee drinking safety during pregnancy causes many disagreements. Doctors are split on what this means for pregnant women, with some advising avoiding caffeine altogether and others saying caffeine-containing beverages are still safe in moderation.

And though a lot is not clear in the question of coffee safety, it is authentically known, that:

* Caffeine readily crosses the placental barrier.
* Clearance of caffeine is slower in pregnant vs non pregnant women.
* The fetus has low levels of enzymes which break down caffeine, so fetal metabolism of caffeine is delayed.

1 Whence all has begun

In 1980, the Food and Drug Administration published recommendations that advised pregnant women to avoid or limit consumption of foods and drugs that contained caffeine. The advice stemmed from the study with rats, conducted by FDA scientists. The study found that one of every five baby rats born to mothers that had been force-fed caffeine while they were pregnant had permanent birth defects - mainly missing or incomplete toes - and delayed development of bones, particularly of the breastbone.

However, subsequent studies have not identified an association between congenital malformations and maternal caffeine consumption in humans. Also, rodents are generally more susceptible to teratogenic influences than humans. Differences exist between rodents and humans regarding caffeine metabolism, and the doses used in the rat study were excessively higher than normal human consumption. A 60-kg human would have to consume approximately 50 to 70 cups of coffee daily to achieve the equivalent dose used in the study.

Two years later, the FDA’s concerns were reinforced by a study of 12,000 pregnant women that linked drinking four or more cups of coffee daily to premature birth and low birth weight. But while smoking turned out to be the chief culprit, the agency has yet to ease its warning.

2 Risk of miscarriage

Although numerous studies on caffeine consumption and the risk of miscarriage have been published since the 1980s, the effect of caffeine intake on the risk of miscarriage remains controversial. The results from the recent Kaiser Permanente Study provide newer, stronger evidence that high caffeine consumption during pregnancy may increase the risk of miscarriage.

This population-based, prospective cohort study examinated the effect of caffeine intake during pregnancy on the risk of miscarriage, taking into account a number of potential confounders, especially the impact of nausea or vomiting during pregnancy.

Prior studies also had linked high caffeine consumption among pregnant women to an elevated risk of miscarriage. But those studies didn’t prove that drinking coffee or other caffeinated beverages can actually lead to a miscarriage. They showed only a statistical link. The new study, in part by tracking women from early in pregnancy through delivery or miscarriage, makes a more convincing case for a cause-and-effect relationship.

Researchers looked at 1,063 pregnant Kaiser Permanente members in San Francisco from October 1996 through October 1998, examined the caffeine effect among women who never changed their pattern of caffeine consumption during their pregnancy. They found:

* Women who consumed 200 mg or more of caffeine per day (two or more cups of regular coffee or five 12-ounce cans of caffeinated soda) had twice the miscarriage risk as women who consumed no caffeine.
* Women who consumed less than 200 mg of caffeine daily had more than 40 percent increased risk of miscarriage.
* Women who were nonsmokers and who had no history of a miscarriage experienced higher risks for miscarriage associated with caffeine consumption.

3 Birth weight and preterm birth

One of the most rigorous studies ever to examine the issue found no link between moderate caffeine consumption late in pregnancy and either preterm delivery or low birth weight. Danish interventional study (randomized, double-blind trial) by Bech and colleagues showed that babies born to mothers who drink moderate amounts of coffee do not weigh less than those whose mothers’ drink decaffeinated coffee in the second half of pregnancy.

The Danish researchers looked at 1,200 healthy pregnant women who reported drinking at least three cups of caffeinated coffee a day, and who were less than 20 weeks pregnant when they entered the study. The women were randomized to receive caffeinated instant coffee or decaffeinated instant coffee. The average daily intake of caffeine for women who drank mostly decaffeinated coffee was 117 milligrams a day — roughly the amount of caffeine found in three 12-ounce soft drinks. Women in the caffeinated-coffee group ended up consuming about 317 milligrams of caffeine a day — the equivalent of four cups of instant caffeinated coffee, or two and a half cups of brewed coffee. Mean caffeine intake was 182 mg lower in the decaffeinated-coffee group than in the other group (the equivalent of approximately 3 cups of instant coffee a day).

There were no significant differences for mean birth weight or mean length of gestation between infants of women in the decaffeinated-coffee group and infants of women in the caffeinated-coffee group. However, the study did not address the safety of caffeine consumption during the early months of pregnancy or the impact of consuming very large amounts of caffeine.

4 Risk of stillbirth

During the previous research Bech group have come to conclusion, that the high consumption of caffeine during pregnancy - more than nine cups of coffee a day - can increase the risk of stillbirth.

Researchers in Denmark identified 18,478 pregnant women booking for delivery at Aarhus University Hospital during 1989-1996. The women completed two questionnaires, providing information such as medical history, smoking habits, alcohol and coffee consumption. The risk of stillbirth increased with the number of cups of coffee a day during pregnancy. Compared with women who did not drink any coffee, women who drank four to seven cups a day had an 80 per cent increased risk of stillbirth, and women who drank eight or more cups a day had a 300 per cent increased risk. These results seem to indicate a threshold effect around four to seven cups per day.

There was no association between coffee consumption and death in the first year of life.

Women with a high intake of coffee are more likely to be smokers and to have a high intake of alcohol, the authors suggest. Adjusting for these factors reduced the risk slightly, but the link remained significant.

———-

After decades of controversy and conflicting evidence, there’s still no real consensus on the safety of caffeine during pregnancy. So what can we find out from modern research?

It is necessary to limit intake of coffee during pregnancy because there is no clear proof that coffee is safe during this period. At the same time, one or two cups of coffee a day probably won’t pose a problem for most women. But woman who has had recurrent pregnancy losses or who is having problems becoming pregnant might want to consider a caffeine-free diet.

Source: Healthassist.net
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Nov 13, 08, 06:55
jirri jirri is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Busy Streets of New York
Posts: 14
Default

I'm always against coffee, or anything that has caffeine in it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Mar 6, 09, 05:56
allvira allvira is offline
Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Default

Thanks for this wonderful articles about coffee. I really like it but.. up to some extent not.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Feb 12, 11, 10:27
alexford alexford is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 19
Default re

Women who drank 200 mg. of caffeine per day had a miscarriage rate of 25 percent; those who drank 100 mg per day had a miscarriage rate of 15 percent, and those who drank no caffeine had a rate of 12 percent.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crazy Pregnancy question Jessie Pregnancy 3 Dec 19, 09 01:28
vancomycin and pregnancy caroline83 Pregnancy 2 Dec 19, 09 01:24
Lansoprazole during pregnancy sankari78 Gastroenterology 1 Sep 2, 09 09:51
Pregnancy and Birth - What is your advice? slimes Women Care 1 May 6, 07 21:16
How do we know what is true - evidence based medicine ROSS Philosophy of Medicine 1 Jul 6, 05 11:33


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:07.


BioMedTalk is looking for the Consortiums to join the projects under the Seventh Framework Programme for research and technological development (FP7) for the results Dissemination. The most suitable calls are:
FP7-INCO.2011-6,    ERA-WIDE,    FP7-ERANET,    FP7-HEALTH,    FP7-KBBE,    FP7-OCEAN,    FP7-ENERGY,    FP7-JPROG,    FP7-NMP

Advertise with Us !

Contact Us !


* Any postings on BioMedTalk.com Board will become public. The BioMedTalk.com Board is not a professional advice forum. Moderators, Members are not eligible or authorized to offer health advice, prescription, est. Members post their personal opinions about Life Science, Medical or Health issues, products and/or services. But, Guests and Members should not rely solely on this information to make decisions. Feel free to post your message, but please consult your physician or healthcare professional when appropriate. BioMedTalk.com cannot determine the accuracy of information that posted to the Forum. All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of BioMedTalk.com, nor Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message.

Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2004-2013 BioMedTalk.com .   All rights reserved.